Katie Hobbs is all but certain to win Arizona's governorship.
Katie Hobbs vs Andy Biggs. The model has Hobbs ahead by 12.3 points, winning 98 percent of 2,000 simulated elections.
The county map
Four ways to read the state: margin, shift from 2024, vote bubbles and turnout
Vote share
Each candidate's projected share and the range of 80 percent of simulations
Scale runs from 25 to 75 percent. The dot is the forecast, the band is the 80 percent range and the brighter tick marks 50 percent.
Projected statewide vote
3,185,856 votes| Candidate | Votes | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Katie Hobbs D | 1,749,792 | 54.9% |
| Andy Biggs R | 1,359,285 | 42.7% |
| Teri Hourihan NL | 48,106 | 1.5% |
| Risa Lombardo G | 28,673 | 0.9% |
| Total | 3,185,856 | 100% |
Each candidate's expected vote in the On Point simulation, at the forecast's projected turnout.
Every simulated outcome
2,000 sims80 percent of simulations fall between D +19.7 and D +5.1. Negative margins are Democratic wins.
The trend
Each side's chance of winning over the forecast's recent updates
Polling
Every poll in the average, and how the model reads it
This is the same On Point polling average as the full average page. The forecast reads the polls through its own Election Day projection, shown as the On Point average in the table below, and blends it with partisan lean and fundamentals.
Polls of the race
Full average| Pollster | Sample | Age | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| On Point average | LOWESS Election Day projection | D +10.5 | |
| HighGround Public Affairs | 400 LV | 7d | D +16.850.5 to 33.7 |
| GrayHouse for Norton (R) | 550 LV | 7d | D +6.050 to 44 |
| HighGround Inc. | 400 LV | 7d | D +15.049 to 34 |
| Steve Cortes for League of American Workers (R) | 1,513 LV | 9d | D +5.748.9 to 43.2 |
| Wick Research | 1,513 LV | 9d | D +6.8 |
| GQR for Hobbs (D) | 600 LV | 11d | D +4.049 to 45 |
| Equis Research | 1,214 RV | 36d | D +6.049 to 43 |
| Arizona State University | 1,300 RV | 41d | D +13.047 to 34 |
| NextGen Polling (R) | 1,627 LV | 57d | D +1.039 to 38 |
| HighGround, Inc. | 400 LV | 58d | D +13.1 |
| Quantus Insights | 780 LV | 59d | D +6.049 to 43 |
| Kreate Strategies (R) | 900 LV | 60d | D +5.045 to 40 |
| Noble Predictive Insights | 923 LV | 63d | D +13.048 to 35 |
| Stealth Analytics | 530 LV | 63d | D +5.043 to 38 |
| Grayhouse (R) | 600 LV | 65d | D +4.049 to 45 |
| The Tarrance Group (R) | 600 LV | 77d | D +4.052 to 48 |
| Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research bipartisan | 913 LV | 79d | D +8.052 to 44 |
| Noble Predictive Insights | 996 RV | 161d | D +4.041 to 37 |
| TIPP Insights (R) | 1,159 LV | 174d | D +10.048 to 38 |
| Noble Predictive Insights | 1,023 RV | 231d | D +7.042 to 35 |
| Center for Excellence in Polling | 519 LV | 264d | D +9.050 to 41 |
| NXTGenP (R) | 2,725 LV | 302d | D +20.1 |
| Emerson College | 850 RV | 339d | D +1.5 |
| Noble Predictive Insights | 948 RV | 423d | D +1.3 |
| Noble Predictive Insights | 1,026 RV | 517d | D +1.3 |
Each margin is the poll as the pollster published it. The forecast counts every poll after its house effect and the undecided split, which is what the trail above shows; hover a margin for the counted value. Lean R and Lean D mark partisan leaning firms.
Read from 656,180 ballots cast so far in Arizona, against the party mix the forecast expected of them, with similar states and primary turnout. Early vote tracker
Who has endorsed
32 public endorsements in this race, each with where it was reported.
- Mark KellyU.S. Senator, Arizonasource
- Gabby GiffordsFormer U.S. Rep., founder of Giffordssource
- Ruben GallegoU.S. Senator, Arizonasource
- Greg StantonU.S. Rep., AZ-04source
- Yassamin AnsariU.S. Rep., AZ-03source
- Cindy McCainFormer WFP Executive Director, widow of John McCain (Republican)source
- Arizona AFL-CIOState labor federationsource
- EMILYs ListPro choice women's PACsource
- Matt GaetzFormer U.S. Rep., FL-01source
- Debbie LeskoFormer U.S. Rep., AZ-08, Maricopa County Supervisorsource
- Paul GosarU.S. Rep., AZ-09source
- Eli CraneU.S. Rep., AZ-02source
- Lauren BoebertU.S. Rep., CO-04source
- Donald Trumpsource
- Doug DuceyFormer Governor of Arizonasource
- Tom EmmerHouse Majority Whipsource
How we got here
From the state's partisan lean to the forecast, one stage at a time
Who votes for whom
Estimated vote by group from the model's simulated electorate
Estimated vote by group
model crosstabs| Group | Share | Hobbs | Biggs |
|---|---|---|---|
| GenderMen | 48% | 49.9 | 47.7 |
| Women | 53% | 57.7 | 39.9 |
| Age18 to 29 | 13% | 57.1 | 40.4 |
| 30 to 44 | 22% | 51.7 | 45.8 |
| 45 to 64 | 30% | 52.9 | 44.6 |
| 65+ | 35% | 55.0 | 42.6 |
| RaceWhite | 66% | 45.5 | 52.1 |
| Black | 5% | 84.2 | 13.4 |
| Latino | 21% | 66.1 | 31.6 |
| Asian and other | 9% | 72.5 | 24.6 |
| Race and genderWhite men | 31% | 39.3 | 58.3 |
| White women | 35% | 50.9 | 46.7 |
| Black men | 2% | 82.3 | 15.3 |
| Black women | 2% | 85.9 | 11.8 |
| Latino men | 10% | 63.7 | 34.0 |
| Latino women | 11% | 68.3 | 29.4 |
| All other races | 9% | 72.5 | 24.6 |
Every county
The projected vote in each county, largest first
Projected vote by county
15 counties| County | Hobbs | Biggs | Other | Total | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statewide | 1,752,522 | 1,356,503 | 76,831 | 3,185,856 | D +12.4 |
| Maricopa County | 1,101,582 | 778,824 | 46,239 | 1,926,645 | D +16.8 |
| Pima County | 316,282 | 163,891 | 10,802 | 490,975 | D +31.1 |
| Pinal County | 77,884 | 108,388 | 5,169 | 191,441 | R +15.9 |
| Yavapai County | 52,728 | 82,989 | 3,053 | 138,770 | R +21.8 |
| Mohave County | 28,339 | 71,312 | 2,555 | 102,206 | R +42.0 |
| Coconino County | 45,825 | 20,609 | 1,913 | 68,347 | D +36.9 |
| Yuma County | 31,826 | 31,293 | 1,288 | 64,407 | D +0.8 |
| Cochise County | 25,024 | 29,448 | 1,627 | 56,099 | R +7.9 |
| Navajo County | 22,675 | 23,950 | 1,443 | 48,068 | R +2.7 |
| Apache County | 21,217 | 8,513 | 982 | 30,712 | D +41.3 |
| Gila County | 9,493 | 16,035 | 735 | 26,263 | R +24.9 |
| Santa Cruz County | 11,740 | 5,205 | 329 | 17,274 | D +37.8 |
| Graham County | 4,230 | 9,718 | 358 | 14,306 | R +38.4 |
| La Paz County | 2,324 | 4,588 | 229 | 7,141 | R +31.7 |
| Greenlee County | 1,353 | 1,740 | 109 | 3,202 | R +12.2 |
Projected 2026 votes from the On Point simulation: each county's expected turnout times its simulated vote share. Totals may differ from the race total by rounding.